To: Rambix

In response to More Detail Emerges On Vicious University Of Minnesota Beatings and this man or woman's blog in general.

Local Dolt,

Do not call what you are doing reporting. You state that you twice previously reported on this incident. No you didn't. You linked other stories that reported the attack. You twice previously linked it. You are a linker, not a reporter.

I have noticed that throughout your blog you have a penchant to bold what you feel are the important sections of linked text. Why is this?

Is your typical readership such a gaggle of half-wits that without your hand holding they end up lost in a sea of words, sentences and paragraphs? With no clue as to where to focus their attention, and to what conclusion is to be drawn from such focal points?

I hope you and your twit audience were able to grasp the meaning of my comment without the customary bolding. Perhaps it is this lack of highlighted verbiage that has caused your readers to flee repectable news sources, such as the Star Tribune, and for you to so handily and willfully misconstrue story after story.

And, in doing so, mold your gullible masses and bring superfluously alarmist attention to a "siege of crime" in minneapolis. When in fact, it is very possible it is merely due to statitical variance.

Satiated,
Douglas Sinclair

P.S. Producing provocative, fresh, and inspiring content is not your strong suit.